|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Mar 1, 2020 16:24:49 GMT -5
I suggest you have a whole draft to correct draft pick errors. what I mean is if you miss your 1992 1st round pick you have until the end of the 1993 1st round to correct it or claim it or you lose it.
this way people don't be tracking me down 4 draft picks after I used their pick demanding players off my team. I get it was your pick but I drafted 4 times after that over 2 seasons and maybe the guys I drafted after would have been different if I knew I was having players plucked off my team. it would just stop problems in the future so I suggest it.
what im talking bout specifically is I used my 1991 2nd round pick because I was told I was up in the draft, then I drafted in the 1992 draft and then the 1992 draft ended. then later someone told me they were supposed to have my 1991 2nd round pick and came demanding a player right off my team. and I get it it makes sense but what I mean is I drafted 4 people after that player and if I knew I was not going to have the guy I drafted originally I would have maybe drafted differently. so im saying he should have had until my pick in the 1992 draft to tell me i drafted his pick so i could fix my pick accordingly in the 2nd round and not have to deal with it 2 drafts later.
that's all im talking about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ottawa Senators on Mar 1, 2020 16:48:39 GMT -5
For context, what he's talking about: nhl90.proboards.com/thread/220/pit-stlHe traded me his '91 2nd, but the pick ownership page wasn't updated to reflect it, and when the draft came around I didn't notice, so he picked Dean MacAmmond with it. nhl90.proboards.com/thread/357/1991-nhl-entry-draft-orderWhen Toronto Maple Leafs was going through the old trades with picks and commenting on them, I went through my old own trades and noticed this. Me and Leafs talked about it and I thought it made the most sense for me to just get MacAmmond now, since, you know, that pick was traded to me after all. Mike said we should PRIVATELY talk to Pittsburgh Penguins and work out a solution. I made my pitch. And now here we are. I didn't think I was being unreasonable or an asshole. If I am I'd love it if other people told me so. I'm not going to die on this hill here its really not that big of a deal. |
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Mar 1, 2020 18:09:50 GMT -5
This is one of those "we are humans and do our best, but cannot be perfect", both as staff, and as teams/members. I do not think Ottawa Senators is in ANY way being an asshole or unreasonable in wanting something he traded for. I do not think Pittsburgh Penguins is being that unreasonable in requesting a time limit because I understand drafting to fill holes and the frustration that could come of having several picks used, then lose something creating a new hole. In some ways, it makes sense to put a timeline on things, but I don't think its reasonably enforceable because in the end the onus still comes down to Toronto Maple Leafs and I to keep better track of draft picks. That's kinda where the buck stops. We'll keep doing our best, and work on ways to make sure this doesn't happen again. I'm not sure we need something as strict as a concrete limit/timeline, as I think people (and staff) here are reasonable and we can get things worked out. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Mar 3, 2020 9:11:03 GMT -5
Dean McAmmond, since he was drafted with the pick, is now a property of the Blues. I actually did this yesterday but forgot to post it here.
We will all do our best to ensure draft picks aren't missed moving forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Mar 3, 2020 14:24:05 GMT -5
im just sayin there should be a reasonable time limit because I don't think more than a season later is reasonable. leafs stole my guy so this is over and that's fine, I have no beef but I don't think people should be losing people 2 drafts after they draft someone because staff or members aren't keeping track of their picks. like I mean if I forgot to play a player for a season I would not get a year back on his YR because that's my fault and I guess to me this is the same thing.
that's all I was sayin. its done now blues got his guy and everyone is happy I jus don't want to see it happen again. theres no need.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Mar 3, 2020 15:28:47 GMT -5
Why don't we just give Blues Pens 1993 2nd?
|
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Mar 3, 2020 15:41:15 GMT -5
Why don't we just give Blues Pens 1993 2nd? Their specific case is satisfactorily done and dealt with. It seems the issue Pittsburgh Penguins is talking about is making sure it doesn't happen in the future, thus putting time limits in place in case it does. Towards which, I have no opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Mar 4, 2020 14:22:07 GMT -5
I am actually good with this moving forward. It's puts the onus on all parties involved, and if it's not recognized then it dissipates. I'm kind of toying with more of it in my brain though, so I'll think on it more.
|
|
|
|
Post by XX - Kruze - XX on Mar 12, 2020 1:17:44 GMT -5
No one wants to see you toying with your onus. 😒 lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Mar 12, 2020 8:14:38 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Mar 14, 2020 20:02:42 GMT -5
rude
|
|
