|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Mar 26, 2023 10:03:48 GMT -5
And vancouver
|
|
|
|
Post by Ottawa Senators on Mar 26, 2023 11:10:36 GMT -5
I like the idea of expansion teams. We're here to have fun and that just seems like it would be fun. Would probably get us a little more trade activity and such in the later seasons too, cause you might want to trade players for picks instead of losing them for nothing, or make expansion draft consideration type deals.
Probably shouldn't do as much expansion as the real NHL but bringing in a new team every three or four seasons would spice things up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning on Mar 27, 2023 9:09:08 GMT -5
Might be difficult to run but it’d be kinda fun to run a type of rule 5 draft in the off-season - each team can protect like 23-25 players and then other teams can claim unprotected players from around the league, but have to leave them on an active line. Something like that. Make it possible to pass on those picks too
|
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Ducks of Anaheim on Mar 27, 2023 9:21:45 GMT -5
can we put a limitt on how far in futurre we can trade away draft pcis?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning on Mar 27, 2023 16:58:15 GMT -5
can we put a limitt on how far in futurre we can trade away draft pcis? This. I like this |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings on Mar 28, 2023 7:02:17 GMT -5
can we put a limitt on how far in futurre we can trade away draft pcis? This is good, it will help people not lose all their picks like an idiot. *stares at mirror* |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Mar 28, 2023 7:19:15 GMT -5
I like it but I also don't like it.
I like it because it stops or prevents people from making major errors that they'll regret. I don't like it because if I trade a 1st and want another guy but I don't have any 1sts until 4 drafts away I don't want to be stuck having to wait until I have that pick available again.
Not to mention, it gives rebuilding teams the opportunity to build farther for the future as well, not just two seasons away. That way if a pick in a trade doesn't pan out they'd have another pick another season or two away that they can look forward to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Mar 28, 2023 11:01:32 GMT -5
can we put a limitt on how far in futurre we can trade away draft pcis? No? |
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Mar 28, 2023 11:02:13 GMT -5
I like it because it stops or prevents people from making major errors that they'll regret. Babysitting. You have described babysitting. On a sim site where most of us have been doing this shit for almost 20 years now. |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings on Mar 28, 2023 12:36:50 GMT -5
I like it because it stops or prevents people from making major errors that they'll regret. Babysitting. You have described babysitting. On a sim site where most of us have been doing this shit for almost 20 years now. I vote for babysitting! |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Mar 28, 2023 17:28:01 GMT -5
I like it because it stops or prevents people from making major errors that they'll regret. Babysitting. You have described babysitting. On a sim site where most of us have been doing this shit for almost 20 years now. More of what I'm describing is Habs. Retro destroyed the team despite anything that we would say. Got upset that his team was shit and then quit the site and now that team is destroyed until this era is done. |
|
|
|
Post by Tampa Bay Lightning on Mar 28, 2023 17:51:46 GMT -5
Babysitting. You have described babysitting. On a sim site where most of us have been doing this shit for almost 20 years now. I vote for babysitting! Checks out |
|
|
|
Post by Edmonton Oilers on Mar 28, 2023 20:35:32 GMT -5
Babysitting. You have described babysitting. On a sim site where most of us have been doing this shit for almost 20 years now. More of what I'm describing is Habs. Retro destroyed the team despite anything that we would say. Got upset that his team was shit and then quit the site and now that team is destroyed until this era is done. So? If he was going to quit, he was going to quit. And the active people have another team to get easy wins over to boost their chances of making playoffs etc. And if the trades were fair, the ebb and flow of things will balance out over time anyway, so I still don't see the problem. At least not a problem worth handcuffing trades on active members who are more interested in, for example, Wendel Clark and Doug Gilmour, than they are Patrice Bergeron and Evgeni Malkin. |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Mar 29, 2023 6:28:33 GMT -5
More of what I'm describing is Habs. Retro destroyed the team despite anything that we would say. Got upset that his team was shit and then quit the site and now that team is destroyed until this era is done. So? If he was going to quit, he was going to quit. And the active people have another team to get easy wins over to boost their chances of making playoffs etc. And if the trades were fair, the ebb and flow of things will balance out over time anyway, so I still don't see the problem. At least not a problem worth handcuffing trades on active members who are more interested in, for example, Wendel Clark and Doug Gilmour, than they are Patrice Bergeron and Evgeni Malkin. Fair enough for me. I agree with you just saying I understand why some guys would want it. |
|
|
|
Post by Vancouver Canucks on Mar 30, 2023 6:53:08 GMT -5
|
|
Apr 12, 2023 22:46:55 GMT -5