|
|
Post by Mighty Ducks of Anaheim on Sept 16, 2021 13:35:57 GMT -5
morozv is 64th overall in pintts
hes playin on 2nd line with jets
this jus provs my point that low endd guys only get major points if playin on top line
and high standgns teams have crazxy points from top to bottom
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 13:44:23 GMT -5
morozv is 64th overall in pintts hes playin on 2nd line with jets this jus provs my point that low endd guys only get major points if playin on top line and high standgns teams have crazxy points from top to bottom Explain to me how I have the 10th best record in the league with the team I have. Niedermayer is a huge part of that success despite the low rankings of my team. If he can compete with the best on my top line then he can help somebody a lot as a depth player. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Sept 16, 2021 13:56:30 GMT -5
that literally cannot be explained. your team baffles me. so does mine too actually lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 13:58:20 GMT -5
that literally cannot be explained. your team baffles me. so does mine too actually lol My thinking has been that you explained in the beginning that defensive players don’t get shown well (as in they have lower overalls). My team could just be filled of strong defensive players (like Niedermayer). Would explain why my goalies always do well then get moved somewhere else and suck ass. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Sept 16, 2021 13:59:49 GMT -5
that literally cannot be explained. your team baffles me. so does mine too actually lol My thinking has been that you explained in the beginning that defensive players don’t get shown well (as in they have lower overalls). My team could just be filled of strong defensive players (like Niedermayer). Would explain why my goalies always do well then get moved somewhere else and suck ass. this would definitely explain a lot. i think there's an underlying chemistry factor in the system as well that i have not solved. some lines with 3 90s players are dominant and amazing. and then there's my team. ive tried every single combination possible for my 90s guys and just cannot find consistency at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 14:01:53 GMT -5
My thinking has been that you explained in the beginning that defensive players don’t get shown well (as in they have lower overalls). My team could just be filled of strong defensive players (like Niedermayer). Would explain why my goalies always do well then get moved somewhere else and suck ass. this would definitely explain a lot. i think there's an underlying chemistry factor in the system as well that i have not solved. some lines with 3 90s players are dominant and amazing. and then there's my team. ive tried every single combination possible for my 90s guys and just cannot find consistency at all. Regardless of the fact, this just proves my point further that this is a fair deal. Niedermayer performs well as has Kronwall. Bruins could very well have a good pick or a garbage pick next season. It’s the luck of the draw when it comes to draft picks . |
|
|
|
Post by Mighty Ducks of Anaheim on Sept 16, 2021 14:04:53 GMT -5
i kno wat u mean avs nd im not tryin to shit on u. i just thnk it luks bad to giv only an 82/84 for 1st and 2nd for best draft we wil ever hav. espcally if bruins gets worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 14:16:03 GMT -5
I get where you are coming from when just looking at overalls but I think we can all agree that an 84 defenceman is worth around the same as an 86 forward.
I got a 1st in the Crosby draft, 2nd in the 2003 draft and Niedermayer for Doan who is an 86.
Moving Niedermayer plus Kronwall who is valued around the same as Doan should be seen as a similar deal if not better because Bruins is adding on additional players rather than including more players with the picks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winnipeg Jets on Sept 16, 2021 14:25:21 GMT -5
im jus sayin that any tem with guys higher than 82s on their first lines (litrally every1 else) not a single guy lik that is anywhere near top of leader boards. Winnipeg Jets Alexei Morozov 81 59 19 43 62 This is a bad example, I am adorable AF. Oh wait that has nothing to do with anything. Never mind. But I am adorable though.  |
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota Wild on Sept 16, 2021 14:34:12 GMT -5
A 1st in '03 should easily land a guy in the upper 80's.
This isn't good.
In fact, most 1st rounders traded here get dealt for guys atleast in that range.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winnipeg Jets on Sept 16, 2021 14:35:55 GMT -5
But to be serious, if the deal is looking like it will get declined you could top 10 protect the 1st so that there is no way a 90 player gets taken here.
With the protection worse case he gave up an 86 + 83 or so which is bad but is the gamble you take when getting good players now.
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 14:38:31 GMT -5
My whole thinking is that we've always valued D more than forwards. If I put an 86 forward instead of Kronwall here I can bet this deal would be accepted easily.
Kronwall is equivalent to an 86 forward so there shouldn't be an issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Sept 16, 2021 14:53:41 GMT -5
New trade is up, so we'll slide this one over.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Sept 16, 2021 14:56:25 GMT -5
New trade is up, so we'll slide this one over. Didn't realize we had an open bidding going. A pretty nasty way for Ducks to get his deal in. |
|
|
|
Post by Toronto Maple Leafs on Sept 16, 2021 15:00:01 GMT -5
New trade is up, so we'll slide this one over. Didn't realize we had an open bidding going. A pretty nasty way for Ducks to get his deal in. I think there's a difference between open bidding, and "new guy joins a site, members don't like trade involving legit draft picks, another member reaches out to new guy and pitches significantly better offer on paper, new guy says yes as members all criticize first trade." Kinda different. We've all been there. |
|
