|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:18:42 GMT -5
if you were me would you do this trade??
21 Joe Sakic 94 F 19 YR
18 Owen Nolan 90 F 20 YR
26 Petr Klima 86 F 9 YR
23 Ron Tugnutt 84 G 14 YR
for
25 Mario Lemieux 97 F 16 YR
27 Wendell Young 78 G 5 YR
1991 1st
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:19:11 GMT -5
Lmao, everybody knows my offer now
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:19:26 GMT -5
I mean it looks ok but I don't want to be stupid for trading lemiuex when I don't really know anyone else but those numbers look nice
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:20:01 GMT -5
Lmao, everybody knows my offer now that's only a problem if its a bad offer tho isn't it?? or did I fuck something else up? |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:21:05 GMT -5
Lmao, everybody knows my offer now that's only a problem if its a bad offer tho isn't it?? or did I fuck something else up? It's not a problem, we just usually don't spew out offers because now it hurts the value of my players when everybody thinks I don't value them as much as I should. |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings on Dec 18, 2019 17:21:06 GMT -5
You have to know that the 91 draft is going to have a lot of potentially good players to draft. Potentially high 80s and up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:21:41 GMT -5
You have to know that the 91 draft is going to have a lot of potentially good players to draft. Potentially high 80s and up. Look at his roster, the likelihood of him getting a decent pick is very low. |
|
|
|
Post by Detroit Red Wings on Dec 18, 2019 17:22:22 GMT -5
Also Mario is the first or second best forward on the site. But Sakic isnt far from that. Mario is worth a lot though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:24:34 GMT -5
that's only a problem if its a bad offer tho isn't it?? or did I fuck something else up? It's not a problem, we just usually don't spew out offers because now it hurts the value of my players when everybody thinks I don't value them as much as I should. oh. but its Mario lemiuex so its special offer. like even I know that because even I know Mario and I know like 5 nhl guys ever im sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:24:38 GMT -5
Are we going to take away from Nolan being apart of this? Not to mention another 86 and a goalie that has been simming better than goalies in the 90s.
I get Mario is worth a lot and that's exactly what this trade is. Sakic and Lemiuex are 3 overalls apart. I think everything I'm sending back covers that and way more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:25:14 GMT -5
It's not a problem, we just usually don't spew out offers because now it hurts the value of my players when everybody thinks I don't value them as much as I should. oh. but its Mario lemiuex so its special offer. like even I know that because even I know Mario and I know like 5 nhl guys ever im sorry. It's all good, it's not a rule, just something people don't usually do lmao. |
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:30:31 GMT -5
Are we going to take away from Nolan being apart of this? Not to mention another 86 and a goalie that has been simming better than goalies in the 90s. I get Mario is worth a lot and that's exactly what this trade is. Sakic and Lemiuex are 3 overalls apart. I think everything I'm sending back covers that and way more. i was thinking this too but my only hang up is that Mario is special. so its not that I don't think this is fair or overpaying me but its that maybe Mario is someone I should absolutely never ever ever trade like if you trade a babe ruth or a wayne gretzky or a tom brady or a micheal Jordan. some things just aren't done no matter what. you know what I mean?? so that's kinda the fence I am on. |
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:31:15 GMT -5
Wayne Gretzky was traded twice lmao
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Avalanche on Dec 18, 2019 17:32:12 GMT -5
Babe Ruth was also traded haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Penguins on Dec 18, 2019 17:32:23 GMT -5
was Lemieux?
|
|
